http://thebestmerchantaccounts.com/106 Tue, 31 May 2011 09:24:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 http://thebestmerchantaccounts.com/106#comment-119 lilbreeze2000 Thu, 02 Jul 2009 06:55:30 +0000 http://thebestmerchantaccounts.com/106#comment-119 Okay, not taking sides here, and I have gotten both sides of the story and I know that you are telling the truth. Your friend did a good thing acknowledging that his checks may come back. However, he should have also informed the merchant that he was going to be out of town, may not have cell phone service, but to leave a message and he would come see her when he gets home. How was the merchant to know that he wasn't just hiding from all this? Hope you can see a point there. On the next level, it was very wrong and unprofessional for the person to put the check where the public could see it, not to mention going in accordance of invasion of privacy, which is a violation on state law. You cannot invade anyone's privacy in anyway. Anyway, going to friends to see if they knew where he was at and if he was seen was not wrong, however giving out the information that he had NSF checks there was, that goes with the statement I made above. But, she was also trying to get the message out for him to come take care of what was needed probably thinking that he absconded (left), because he didn't give her information that he was not going to be able to get calls, and due to the thinking process that was going on there, that's what she thought she was going to have to do to get her money, prosecute. As for the mom, I honestly don't think that she was trying to solicite money from her. After all it wasn't the mothers debt or responsibility to pay for her sons negiligences. Even though the mother felt that way, I dont think this was the case. A child very rarley leaves and not tell parents where they are, since the merchant was feeling that he abonded the situation, i think she was informing the mother of the recourse action that she was going to have to take and why. Maybe it wasn't done in a tactful way. Right now the only thing your friend can do is pay what he owes if he hasn't already. If this goes to the prosecuting attorney, it's going to cost more. not only will he have to pay his bank, merchant, but court costs and fines as well. As for the banks mistakes, he needs to bring that to the banks attention, most banks will fix their mistakes and help with refunding money if that would be the case. Your friend should talk to the merchant since he has known her all his life and let those two come to an agreement, but tell him to do it with a coll calm head. I think this is jsut lack of communication, and a bad mix up, I wish your friend luck. Okay, not taking sides here, and I have gotten both sides of the story and I know that you are telling the truth. Your friend did a good thing acknowledging that his checks may come back. However, he should have also informed the merchant that he was going to be out of town, may not have cell phone service, but to leave a message and he would come see her when he gets home. How was the merchant to know that he wasn’t just hiding from all this? Hope you can see a point there. On the next level, it was very wrong and unprofessional for the person to put the check where the public could see it, not to mention going in accordance of invasion of privacy, which is a violation on state law. You cannot invade anyone’s privacy in anyway. Anyway, going to friends to see if they knew where he was at and if he was seen was not wrong, however giving out the information that he had NSF checks there was, that goes with the statement I made above. But, she was also trying to get the message out for him to come take care of what was needed probably thinking that he absconded (left), because he didn’t give her information that he was not going to be able to get calls, and due to the thinking process that was going on there, that’s what she thought she was going to have to do to get her money, prosecute. As for the mom, I honestly don’t think that she was trying to solicite money from her. After all it wasn’t the mothers debt or responsibility to pay for her sons negiligences. Even though the mother felt that way, I dont think this was the case. A child very rarley leaves and not tell parents where they are, since the merchant was feeling that he abonded the situation, i think she was informing the mother of the recourse action that she was going to have to take and why. Maybe it wasn’t done in a tactful way.
Right now the only thing your friend can do is pay what he owes if he hasn’t already. If this goes to the prosecuting attorney, it’s going to cost more. not only will he have to pay his bank, merchant, but court costs and fines as well. As for the banks mistakes, he needs to bring that to the banks attention, most banks will fix their mistakes and help with refunding money if that would be the case. Your friend should talk to the merchant since he has known her all his life and let those two come to an agreement, but tell him to do it with a coll calm head. I think this is jsut lack of communication, and a bad mix up, I wish your friend luck.

]]> http://thebestmerchantaccounts.com/106#comment-118 PATRICIA MS Tue, 30 Jun 2009 04:36:54 +0000 http://thebestmerchantaccounts.com/106#comment-118 Contact a lawyer. He needs help! Contact a lawyer. He needs help!

]]>